Search found 12 matches
- Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:00 am
- Forum: TestLink 1.9
- Topic: Generate Requirement Specification Document - why HTML only?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 16164
Re: Generate Requirement Specification Document - why HTML o
It's a catch-22, though. If I wanted to contribute, I would need to know what the "testlink dev" way is for that. Every FOSS project does that differently, so I'm not going to assume anything. If you don't want to tell us how you wish to receive patches, then I can't contribute. Just put a...
- Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:09 pm
- Forum: TestLink 1.9
- Topic: Generate Requirement Specification Document - why HTML only?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 16164
Re: Generate Requirement Specification Document - why HTML o
I can't speak for anyone else, but I tested it. I don't use Twitter, though. @fman: is there a document describing things like the current branches / commit, push policy for TestLink on gitorious? It took me a while to figure out you are committing to the testlink_1_9 branch. Makes it easier to jump...
- Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:59 am
- Forum: TestLink 1.9
- Topic: Generate Requirement Specification Document - why HTML only?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 16164
Re: Generate Requirement Specification Document - why HTML o
As noted in the mantis ticket (for those only following this thread): a fix has been submitted and seems to work fine - I hope this makes it in 1.9.12 soon!
- Fri Sep 19, 2014 2:19 pm
- Forum: TestLink 1.9
- Topic: Generate Requirement Specification Document - why HTML only?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 16164
Re: Generate Requirement Specification Document - why HTML o
Awesome - I just noticed the link to the patch for reintroducing the export. I'll test it as soon as I have a couple of hours to dedicate to it. I haven't pulled the GIT repo yet, so it'll take some time to get a development version up and running.
- Thu Sep 11, 2014 3:22 pm
- Forum: TestLink 1.9
- Topic: Generate Requirement Specification Document - why HTML only?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 16164
Re: Generate Requirement Specification Document - why HTML o
Unless I wasn't doing it right, I didn't see the .doc export in 1.9.10 either, but it is in 1.9.9. I think we'll stick to 1.9.9 for now, if there are plans to reintroduce it in 1.9.12.
As always, thanks for your hard work on TestLink!
As always, thanks for your hard work on TestLink!
- Thu Sep 11, 2014 1:07 am
- Forum: TestLink 1.9
- Topic: Generate Requirement Specification Document - why HTML only?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 16164
Re: Generate Requirement Specification Document - why HTML o
We performed a test upgrade from 1.9.4 to 1.9.11 today and now also realized that this feature is now gone. Unfortunately, that is one of our highest use capabilities, we use it to share requirements with customers that can't log into Testlink themselves, so this would block us from upgrading. Is th...
- Fri Oct 05, 2012 2:22 pm
- Forum: TestLink 1.9
- Topic: Default ordering of Requirement within Spec in 1.9.4
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2653
Default ordering of Requirement within Spec in 1.9.4
After upgrading from 1.9.3 to 1.9.4, the default ordering of newly created Requirements within a Req Spec as shown in the Navigator has changed from oldest -> newest to newest -> oldest. Is there a configuration setting to set this ordering back to what it was in 1.9.3? I looked at $tlCfg->gui->tpro...
- Fri Dec 02, 2011 2:19 pm
- Forum: Installation and configuration
- Topic: [SOLVED] Fresh install of 1.9.3 doesn't create first project
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6171
Re: Fresh install of 1.9.3 doesn't create the first project
Alright - I got it working - it turns out that having the iconv extension disabled (which is the default for Arch Linux) makes TestLink fail! To fix this, uncomment the following line in php.ini (located in /etc/php/php.ini for Arch). ;extension=iconv.so If there is a way to add this dependency to t...
- Fri Dec 02, 2011 1:47 pm
- Forum: Installation and configuration
- Topic: [SOLVED] Fresh install of 1.9.3 doesn't create first project
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6171
Re: Fresh install of 1.9.3 doesn't create the first project
I inserted the following row: insert into testprojects (id, prefix) values (1, 'TST'); When I log in now, I get the main page up, but without any menus or headers - I have a white part where the logo, the "Home - Specification - Execute, etc." banner, etc. should be. When I click on Projec...
- Fri Dec 02, 2011 3:21 am
- Forum: Installation and configuration
- Topic: [SOLVED] Fresh install of 1.9.3 doesn't create first project
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6171
[SOLVED] Fresh install of 1.9.3 doesn't create first project
I'm stumped on this - I perform a fresh installation of Testlink 1.9.3 (see specs below). The installation works fine - I can tell the tables have been created on my PostgreSQL db. However, when I log in for the first time, I am prompted to create the first project. When I fill out the values and cl...
- Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:37 am
- Forum: General Testing and Test management
- Topic: Support for "Change" object
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3556
Support for "Change" object
We're still new to using Testlink and we like what we see so far. However, in addition to the "Requirements" and "Test" objects, I'd like to know if anyone else has any need for a "Change" object? I mean "Change" in the ITIL sense (incident, problem, Change, ....
- Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:16 am
- Forum: Companies using Test Link
- Topic: Ontracks Consulting Ltd.
- Replies: 0
- Views: 5916
Ontracks Consulting Ltd.
Ontracks Consulting Ltd. ( http://www.ontracksconsulting.com ) is an IBM Business Partner and implementer of IBM Tivoli Maximo (Enterprise and IT Asset Management) as well as ClickSoftware (mobile planning/scheduling software). We also market value-add products to our partner's software. We are curr...