Search found 10 matches
- Tue Mar 29, 2011 6:58 pm
- Forum: TestLink 1.9
- Topic: [SOLVED] Search not working with 1.9.1
- Replies: 9
- Views: 11265
Re: Search not working with 1.9.1
Added info to bug and reopened. No worries on the issue. Just want to thank you for looking into it. Personally, I was just happy to have pin pointed the issue. We have three test link servers running and two of them have around 3000+ test cases. Not having the search working was killing me/us.
- Mon Mar 28, 2011 2:41 pm
- Forum: TestLink 1.9
- Topic: [SOLVED] Search not working with 1.9.1
- Replies: 9
- Views: 11265
Re: Search not working with 1.9.1
I finally figured out what the issue was with our search. In our custom_config.inc.php file, the following setting was causing our search to not work: $g_testcase_cfg->can_edit_executed=1; This setting was a valid setting in Testlink 1.7.4 and following best practices it was in our custom_config.inc...
- Tue Feb 22, 2011 3:41 pm
- Forum: TestLink 1.9
- Topic: [SOLVED] Search not working with 1.9.1
- Replies: 9
- Views: 11265
Re: Search not working with 1.9.1
Search isn't working for me either, I've got a test db with around 300 cases in it, the search just refuses to display a list of test cases it has found, or worse still finds a woefully incorrect amount (finding 16 test cases when I search via hardcoded test case ID). Well I am glad it is not just ...
- Fri Feb 18, 2011 3:37 pm
- Forum: TestLink 1.9
- Topic: [SOLVED] Search not working with 1.9.1
- Replies: 9
- Views: 11265
Re: Search not working with 1.9.1
Wanting to see the differences in a clean db's data and our db I took the time to set up a machine and do a clean install of 1.9.1. I was able to get this to happen with a clean install of 1.9.1. I must be missing something because the search is just not working for me. The db in mantis: http://mant...
- Thu Feb 17, 2011 9:06 pm
- Forum: TestLink 1.9
- Topic: [SOLVED] Search not working with 1.9.1
- Replies: 9
- Views: 11265
Re: Search not working with 1.9.1
So I did a little more digging. When I search using just the numbers without the prefix, what is being sent by tcSearch.php is the following, which seems correct. keyword_id =0 version =0 custom_field_id =0 name = summary = steps = expected_results = custom_field_value = targetTestCase ='PVNG8678' p...
- Thu Feb 17, 2011 5:38 pm
- Forum: TestLink 1.9
- Topic: [SOLVED] Search not working with 1.9.1
- Replies: 9
- Views: 11265
[SOLVED] Search not working with 1.9.1
Trying to debug why our searches are not working. I would like to try and find a solution without needing to upload our db to mantis if that is possible. Keeping test cases in house is a concern with my higher ups (not my choice), so I am trying to do this myself and would love any help. History of ...
- Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:27 pm
- Forum: TestLink 1.9
- Topic: Search not working.
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7210
Re: Search not working.
Amaradana That issue was marked as resolved and unreproducible. I have opened a new issue and hopefully we can see where that goes. This is def broken on my end and we have run through a lot to see how to get this going with no joy.
- Tue Jan 11, 2011 9:22 pm
- Forum: TestLink 1.9
- Topic: Search not working.
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7210
Re: Search not working.
Thanks for letting me know. Would you let me know what the link is to this issue is that you have already added? I would like to be able to follow the progress. I will check mantis for the quick search and add if needed.
- Tue Jan 11, 2011 7:25 pm
- Forum: TestLink 1.9
- Topic: Search not working.
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7210
Re: Search not working.
Also when using Search Test Cases from the home screen is not yielding results as well.
- Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:02 pm
- Forum: TestLink 1.9
- Topic: Search not working.
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7210
Search not working.
Running TestLink Version 1.9.0. upgraded from 1.7.4 -> 1.8.5 -> 1.9.0 The search box is not finding testcases. Example would be: searching for a test case id with a prefix of TST (TST199 where TST199 does exist) returns zero returns Test Case does not exist. Should this work? Are we missing some typ...