TestLink

How can i link teslink 1.9.6 to an issue tarcker (mantis)? If I follow the 1.9 documentation, this does not work

Hi, we currently use Testuff at our company, but I dont really like the tool (for multiple reasons). Since I know Testlink and its potential, I wanted to try and migrate all the cases from Testuff to testlink. However, the export from Testuff (xls) and the import to Testlink (xls->xml) has a differe...

yes, changed the reference by unchecking the missing #14 and checking Microsoft Word 12.0 object library...b ut that gives the error I wrote in the main topic....

When I open the xls file and click "Check columns" or "Generate XML" I get the message: Compile error; Can't find project or library Using Microsoft Excel 2007... Anyone?? Update: Just changed something in the references and got a big further, now get a runtime error 76: Cant fin...

mm, how detailed do you need it? I can only descibe it functionally. TO me a test scenario consists of several testcases in any different order. These scenarios can then be linked to a testplan as to be executed for (e.g.) secnario testing or User Acceptance Testing (which ever you want to call it)....

It depends how you set up your testcases obviously. Since it is not possible to "refer" to other testcases within a testcase (e.g. choose the testcases to get to where you want to start another testcase), it could be that you describe steps that are not in any other testcase. For example; ...

In version 1.9 there is the option to create individual test steps which is a good thing! However, you cna only pass or fail the complete testcase in stead of validating all the different test steps. In this way you cannot pinpoint which teststep went wrong. Is it not possible to be able to validate...

Create a Testscenario as part of a tree. For example

TC1.1
TC1.2
TC1.3
TC2.1
TC2.2

TS1: TC1.3; TC1.1; TC2.2
TS2: TC2.1; TC1.2

TP1: TS1; TS2

Hi, I tried to create scenarios using Testlink, but got a little bit stuck; Let's take an example, with a test tree like this: System 1. Application1 1.1 Login (test suite) 1.1.1 Log (test case) 1.1.2 Change password 1.1.3 Account blocked after several tries 1.2 Welcome 1.2.1 Popup first connection ...

Like I said, in America, it's more common :D This does not mean that the test engeneer is not used in Europe.... But anyhow, there is nothing wrong with implementing a certain testlink logic (like IEEE), but the basis of a tool should be some sort of methodology, not a free way of creating your own ...

I don't completely agree with that policy. Mainly because I think that you should have a firm approved basis for your testing tool. If you use IEEE, TMAP or ISTQB for this, does not really matter. But to create a tool without a basis is like handing over an Excel sheet which you can configure yourse...

Hi all, We are now using Elementool as a bug tracking system here. Since there is nog integration option with testlink, this seems to be a bit of a problem. However. Is it nog possible to "swich on" the brug tracking feature without having to link it? Meaning that I can just put any number...

Well finally I created a translation of my own...mind you; it's not perfect!!! (and help files are not translated yet)...

http://www.testlink.org/mantis/view.php?id=1642

Can someone please shoot me? When you have a locale of nl_NL and there is no Dir for that in the gui/help, it's bound not to work....insn't it?

Sorry

Hi, I tried the solution provided with bug 1454. But I still get the message....

Please help!!!! It's important that i fix this soon, since I'm trying to implement Testlink in the organisation here....