The release related discussions, plans and questions.
cosmo
Advanced user
Posts: 19 Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 9:40 am
Post
by cosmo » Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:05 am
hello @all,
is it possible to create a custom field and assign it for example to test case 1 and not to test case 2?
cosmo
fman
Member of TestLink Community
Posts: 3123 Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 7:19 am
Post
by fman » Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:59 pm
No.
cosmo
Advanced user
Posts: 19 Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 9:40 am
Post
by cosmo » Wed Jan 16, 2008 3:47 pm
fman wrote: No.
oh, maybe in the next version. its useful for test variations.
fman
Member of TestLink Community
Posts: 3123 Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 7:19 am
Post
by fman » Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:38 pm
Not in next version, because it means a bg change to database.
surely some workaround can be found.
Please explain in details what do you would like to do.
cosmo
Advanced user
Posts: 19 Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 9:40 am
Post
by cosmo » Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:07 pm
one example:
in test case 1 you have to calculate with different variables (for example formula: a + b = c). So you need fields for the values for "a" and "b".
in test case 2 you have to calculate with other variables (formula: d+e+f=g). you need fields for three values and you need other field names.
francisl
Advanced user
Posts: 25 Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:27 am
Location: Australia
Post
by francisl » Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:19 pm
I would suggest to put these as details into step description.
Regards,
Francis
havlatm
Member of TestLink Community
Posts: 940 Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 1:24 am
Location: Czech
Post
by havlatm » Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:29 pm
I guess that Excel sheet fits better to your need than TL. The generic inteligence for custom fields is time expensive to develop. Maybe concrete functionality make sense. However I believe that you find a better solution via your automation scripts or something like that.
cosmo
Advanced user
Posts: 19 Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 9:40 am
Post
by cosmo » Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:14 pm
No. I mean, it´s useful to have for test case 1 one multiselection list and for test case 2 two fields from type string and for test case 3 four fields from type float.
cosmo
Advanced user
Posts: 19 Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 9:40 am
Post
by cosmo » Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:20 pm
@ francisl:
yes, but its not so flexible.
havlatm
Member of TestLink Community
Posts: 940 Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 1:24 am
Location: Czech
Post
by havlatm » Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:05 pm
How TL should know which type(s) to offer you? Why there should not be defined all these CF types for all test cases?
francisl
Advanced user
Posts: 25 Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:27 am
Location: Australia
Post
by francisl » Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:14 am
Is there any test tool provide these feature? I still think these should be part of the test step description.
Instead, I think it would be more useful to allow multiple test steps and expected results in each test case.
Regards,
Francis
cosmo
Advanced user
Posts: 19 Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 9:40 am
Post
by cosmo » Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:16 am
yes and when you could nominate this fields not "expected results" or "steps" but "value 1" or "value 2" it will be a custom field.
havlatm
Member of TestLink Community
Posts: 940 Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 1:24 am
Location: Czech
Post
by havlatm » Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:47 am
I guess that you are looking for some template (used to create TC), that allows to fill some parameters defined in Test Suite level.
If I'm right:
The first step is develop simple TC templates. It's on the track. We can develop such intelligence later.