Hi fman,
Probably we have made lot of mistakes, when we did our initial db modelling, but IMHO you can not complain about the missing column ( a column that do you need NOW, but may be tomorrow you are going to complain for another column for your needs)
I dont want to say you've made a lot of mistakes with the design of your database and i also understand you could not put for everyone a column into tables for his/her needs. But what i want to say is that many people befor me asked for help with some queries or the db schema (that seems like the users perhaps needs this information) and the reacton only was: "its not possible".
In addition in a previous post I've provided the advice to read our code, thing that seems you have ignored ( feedback was never provided).
sorry that i do not give a response to your post, i studied of course the code and tried to understand how the tree is build but i was not able to check all.
I read the code but i really could not find the right functions etc which are building the tree.
Seems that instead of asking for help you are REQUESTING HELP THAT HAS TO BE PROVIDED ASAP.
I never said i need the information ASAP. I everytime waited a long time for a answer.
The DB MODEL IS AVAILABLE, the scripts for POSTGRES has the FK, then what is the missing info ?
In the postgres sql i also could not find any FK (version 1.9.4). Maybe i am looking not on the right script?
At the end i only want to say, if i checked at the beginning the code how the tree building works than i would not need help.
Thanks for your answer.